On 01/03/2012 06:54 PM, Don Zickus wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 03:29:55PM -0500, Chris Evich wrote: >>> Ah. Sorry about that. I believe you are right. I misread the code >>> (python isn't my strong suite :-) ). >>> >>> Might be interesting to run a quick test with something like >>> --client_test_setup to double check. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Don >> >> No need to apologize, double and triple-checking rarely hurts. I >> can't test the server-side, but just now for the client both sets of >> options seem to parse... >> >> # bin/autotest -t somethingdifferent --verbose --tap run libvirt >> DEBUG:root:Cleaning up previously found state file >> 15:02:12 INFO | Writing results to >> /usr/local/autotest/client/results/somethingdifferent >> 15:02:12 DEBUG| Initializing the state engine >> ...cut... > > Cool. Sorry for the noise and thanks for the small changes!
Ok gentlemen, it looks good to me as well, and it doesn't bring any regressions to server side operation. Applied: https://github.com/autotest/autotest/commit/11252e58d0a45bddd07697ce9dd8a60cd3673e3f _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list [email protected] http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
