On 03/30/2012 11:48 PM, a...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Alex Jia<a...@redhat.com>
>
> Running scan_results.py to get test result in autotest root
> directory instead of multi-layers subdirectory, it will be
> more friendly and convenient for users.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Jia<a...@redhat.com>
> ---
> client/tools/scan_results.py | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/client/tools/scan_results.py b/client/tools/scan_results.py
> index 71dddde..867c947 100755
> --- a/client/tools/scan_results.py
> +++ b/client/tools/scan_results.py
> @@ -90,9 +90,11 @@ def main(resfiles):
>
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
> - import sys, glob
> + import os, sys, glob
> +
> + curr_path = os.getcwd()
> + resfiles = glob.glob("%s/client/results/default/status*" %curr_path)
>
> - resfiles = glob.glob("../../results/default/status*")
> if len(sys.argv)> 1:
> if sys.argv[1] == "-h" or sys.argv[1] == "--help":
> print "Usage: %s [result files]" % sys.argv[0]
Hey,
One question occurred to me: Is it okay to assume the 'default' job
name in the use-case context of this tool? i.e .Will this tool ever be
used on results generated from a job run by the autotest server or with
a different job-name?
N.B. I've never used this tool, please forgive my ignorance if ^^^^
makes no sense.
--
Chris Evich, RHCA, RHCE, RHCDS, RHCSS
Quality Assurance Engineer
e-mail: cevich + `@' + redhat.com o: 1-888-RED-HAT1 x44214
_______________________________________________
Autotest mailing list
Autotest@test.kernel.org
http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
