On 06/04/2012 03:58 AM, Alex Jia wrote: > If the old virsh_cmd() can't meet our requirement, we should improve it > ASAP, at present, libvirt-autotest hasn't many test cases, otherwise, as > you said, I will become a huge work in the future if > we don't do it now. thanks.
Also true, and always returning a string is inflexible. Maybe the benefits of a more precise return is worth the cost of re-writing all the current callers? Alex is right, if it's not good now, better to fix it early than later. I'm okay with this too, and willing to help fix callers if that makes the task easier (assuming it makes sense). -- Chris Evich, RHCA, RHCE, RHCDS, RHCSS Quality Assurance Engineer e-mail: cevich + `@' + redhat.com o: 1-888-RED-HAT1 x44214 _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list Autotest@test.kernel.org http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
