On 07/03/2012 04:40 PM, Yu Mingfei wrote: > On 7/3/2012 4:26 PM, Alex Jia wrote: >> On 07/03/2012 04:13 PM, Yu Mingfei wrote: >>> On 7/3/2012 4:05 PM, Yu Mingfei wrote: >>>> , couldn't virsh edit do this? >>> With a new vm, it will be esay tobe cleaned up. >>> >>> >> It's not a good reason :), because you're writing a test case to test >> 'virsh edit', so you also > Thanks for you comment. > But I though you have mistaked "virsh edit" and "virt-edit".^_^ > I am testing virt-edit now, and I just need a new guest for test. Your function naming lets me confused ;) and don't suggest you to use 'a-b' naming style.
If so, maybe, you may write a virsh_define() case to define a vm with different XML configuration then verify if your change is valid. > >> may use it to rename a vm firstly then return the new vm instead of >> directly editor vm's >> XML configuration then run virsh define. >> >> > _______________________________________________ Autotest mailing list Autotest@test.kernel.org http://test.kernel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/autotest
