At 11:55 20/4/01 -0400, Sam Ruby wrote: >Peter Donald wrote: >> >> well I guess I differ in opinion ... enough to veto a beta release ;) > >Point of order. Releases of Apache subprojects are not subject to veto. >Majority rules with a minimum quorum of 3 positive votes is all that is >required. Okay then maybe I should list it as a "showstopper" (or whatever that is called). Simple enough to make it stick ;) Cheers, Pete *-----------------------------------------------------* | "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, | | and proving that there is no need to do so - almost | | everyone gets busy on the proof." | | - John Kenneth Galbraith | *-----------------------------------------------------* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Status of framework beta release? Berin Loritsch
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Peter Donald
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Berin Loritsch
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Peter Donald
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Berin Loritsch
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Peter Donald
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Sam Ruby
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Peter Donald
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Peter Donald
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Paul Hammant
- RE: Status of framework beta release? Stephen McConnell
- RE: Status of framework beta release? Peter Donald
- RE: Status of framework beta release? Stephen McConnell
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Berin Loritsch
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Peter Donald
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Berin Loritsch
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Peter Donald
- Re: Status of framework beta release? Paul Hammant
