At 12:20 21/4/01 +0200, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>> I would say stability in general hasn't been it's strong point ... lumping
>> a whole bunch of junk into one jar (including stuff that is volatile - see
>> excalibur) is not a way to achieve stability ;)
>
>Reality check ...!!
>
> 1. we are not talking about "junk"
Some of it is (and I can say that because I wrote it) ;)
> 2. we are talking about a codebase that has not been sufficiently
> tested to call beta
> 3. separation of this code base is not intended to achieve stability
Thats my main in making it a separate CVS.
> 4. separation of the code base will enable better manageability of
> of volatile content
right ... so are you agreeing or disagreeing that there should be a
separate CVS ?
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
