At 01:07 13/5/01 +0100, Paul Hammant wrote:
>Folks,
>
>Well done on the release. Having not downloaded Avalon for a month or so,
porting has proven
>quite easy. It's just been package names and class names. Quite pleasing
compared to the same
>excerise in December.
hopefully with framework and excalibur there will be nothing to "port" from
now on .... If we have done it correctly (fingers crossed) we should be
forward compatible from now onwards ;)
Now we just got to get cornerstone/phoenix into the same state ;)
>scratchpad
>==========
>
>Is this code we're unsure about? Is it designed to be move back to core
jars or consigned to the scrapheap?
Parts scrapheap (Primes/Circuit/DependencyGraph) unless there is a deman
for it. The other parts are waiting a rewrite (ie proxy/thread). Then there
is the "other" stuff that I don't know about or hasn't seen deman/testing etc.
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
