At 01:07 PM 5/26/01 -0600, Mircea Toma wrote:
>I know that you people put a lot of thought into the framework but I'm using
>Configuration in a distributed environment (Weblogic JMX) and configuring
>remote MBeans is not possible. I was wondering if making Configuration
>serializable would solve the problem of configuring remotely the application
>(by having Configurable MBean-s and a global MBeanServer to send the
>Configuration objects).....there might be other solutions that I'm not aware
>of ?!
It sounds nice initially but I am a little reluctant to do it at the moment
as I don't think we are willing enough atm to guarentee a serialized
format. Perhaps in the interim you could do something like
class MyConfiguration extends Configuration implements Serializable {}
Another way of combatting it would be "serializing" it to XML and then
using A ConfigurationBuilder on server to rebuild configuration object. Not
sure - what do you think ?
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
