At 06:24 AM 5/27/01 -0700, Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
>> It sounds nice initially but I am a little reluctant
>> to do it at the moment
>> as I don't think we are willing enough atm to
>> guarentee a serialized
>> format.
>
>Question: Would it be reasonable to make that a
>requirement? It would make distributed configuration
>of a group of servers easier.
I don't really have any experience in keeping backwards compatibility for
serialized form. Though it would 0probably be a good idea ;)
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
