On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 22:42, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Peter Donald wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 06:10, giacomo wrote:
> >>I have to confess that I don't know how this works in all my components
> >>that are based on AbstractLoggable and have the logger passed in from
> >>ExcaliburCM.
> >
> > Just looked at ExcaliburCM and it doesn't really support separate loggers
> > per component. Berin what do you think of adding an extra attribute to
> > component definition so that you can specify name of logger. Then later
> > on instead of doing
>
> I was thinking about that before. We need to add an attribute to the
> component definitions (probably "logger"). Something like this to specify
> it:
>
> <component role="com.foo.Component"
> class="com.foo.DefaultComponent"
> logger="foo"/>
>
> The attribute name is negotiable ;).
logger works for me.
> Think this will help, combined with your changes for the Logger?
Which changes are you referring to? It should work without any changes.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Cheers,
Pete
*-----------------------------------------------------*
| "Faced with the choice between changing one's mind, |
| and proving that there is no need to do so - almost |
| everyone gets busy on the proof." |
| - John Kenneth Galbraith |
*-----------------------------------------------------*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
