On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Peter Donald wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 06:10, giacomo wrote:
> >
> >>I have to confess that I don't know how this works in all my components
> >>that are based on AbstractLoggable and have the logger passed in from
> >>ExcaliburCM.
> >>
> >
> > Just looked at ExcaliburCM and it doesn't really support separate loggers per
> > component. Berin what do you think of adding an extra attribute to component
> > definition so that you can specify name of logger. Then later on instead of
> > doing
>
>
> I was thinking about that before. We need to add an attribute to the component
> definitions (probably "logger"). Something like this to specify it:
>
> <component role="com.foo.Component"
> class="com.foo.DefaultComponent"
> logger="foo"/>
>
> The attribute name is negotiable ;).
>
> Think this will help, combined with your changes for the Logger?
I like it, +1.
Giacomo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
