On Sunday, January 6, 2002, at 03:55 PM, Paul Hammant wrote: > I've been working quite a bit in the Commons project on the ARMI tool. > First off, it has to be renamed - ARMI is used by an academic group as > "Asynchonous RMI". Secondly I'm not getting huge approval (in one case > outright hostility) there - I do not know if there will be a consensus > of +1s by committers when it comes to move ARMI from 'sandbox' to > 'main'.
I received some similar disapproval from the XML folks regarding Labrador being positioned as the common architecture for Axis and XML-RPC. It's unfortunate, because if we could all sit down as a group, we could nail down a common architecture for getting all of these architectures working and playing together SOAP/Axis, XML-RPC, RMI, ARMI, and Labrador. Instead, the only thing I heard was "Why do we need another broker?" Oh well. I'm going to release 0.2 today if SourceForge ever comes back up (http://xml-labrador.sourceforge.net). -- Tom Bradford - http://www.tbradford.org Developer - Apache Xindice (Native XML Database) Creator - Project Labrador (XML Object Broker) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
