Berin, > I am satisfied with the current releases of the three subprojects > Framework, > Excalibur, and LogKit. I would like to start discussions on what is > necessary > to have a Beta release of both Cornerstone and Phoenix. > > I do have to clarify what I consider core to Cornerstone. That is the > shared > blocks and services declared in the source code. All the apps do not > have to > be at beta quality, and we can have the docs state what is ready and > what is > not.
Yup Cornerstone is a bit of conundrum. I see the following distributions: 1) cornerstone-src.zip / tar.gz - the rebuildable source for the services and blocks that are the components first developed. i.e. lib/ and src/ 2) cornerstone.jar - the compiled and immediately reusable classes for (1). 3) cornerstone-all-src.zip / tar.gz - the reuildable source for all /src and apps/ 4) cornerstone-xxxxx.sar - Where xxxxx could be demo, db, httpproxy, simpleserver, jesktop, ftpserver, overlord and xcommander I think 'bay' should be excluded as it will not work (Catalina is as far as I can see not embeddable in the forms I have tried). I am not sure of the rules for 'hsql'. The block compiles against an unreleased jar from http://sourceforge.net/projects/hsqldb. Besides that, the jar is not Apache licensed so we would have to be careful distributing it (in a sar). It is a compatible BSD style licese though. We should be careful to note the alpha/beta/stable status for each, but still list them for download. Regards, - Paul H -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
