On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:07, Berin Loritsch wrote: > Stephen McConnell wrote: > > Pete suggested: > >>framework.service.ServiceManager > >>framework.service.Servicable > > > > This is perfect! > > Steve. > > Not for what has been discussed. I.e. a lightweight form of JNDI.
So we are going towards that ? > Service is even more narrow than Component, as Service is a specific > type of Component. Correct but it is inline with the way all our projects use it. I haven't looked closely but I assume all the ones that develoeprs from here are involved with enforce this contract. ie phoenix and thus james explictly enforces it, as does the ant proposal - IIRC Cocoon does not require it but it is the way that it is used - what about EOB - does it access services via interfaces? -- Cheers, Pete *---------------------------------------------------------* | Programming today is a race between software engineers | | striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof | | programs,and the universe trying to produce bigger and | | better idiots. So far, the universe is winning. | | - Richard Cook | *---------------------------------------------------------* -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>