On Sun, 12 May 2002 08:55, Stephen McConnell wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > >>But out-of-date. > >>The lifecycle descriptions are missing a few things: > >> > >> b) Serviceable is missing > > > >where does it go? > > Serviceable should appear wherever Composable appears. Basically > Serviceable is a replacement for Composable - Serviceable takes a > ServiceManager as (as distinct from Composable/ComponentManager). > ServiceManager is independent of the Component marker interface > enabling broader application and support for existing "non-Avalon" > components (because ServiceManager exposes java.lang.Object as distinct > from Component).
Which reminds me. Someone suggested that we deprecated the Block interface as it is just a marker interface. However we would have to also deprecate the Composable interface within the context of Phoenix as now no Blocks would implement the Component interface. Thoughts on that? -- Cheers, Peter Donald -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
