Peter Donald wrote:
>On Sun, 12 May 2002 08:55, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
>
>>Leo Simons wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>But out-of-date.
>>>>The lifecycle descriptions are missing a few things:
>>>>
>>>> b) Serviceable is missing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>where does it go?
>>>
>>>
>>Serviceable should appear wherever Composable appears. Basically
>>Serviceable is a replacement for Composable - Serviceable takes a
>>ServiceManager as (as distinct from Composable/ComponentManager).
>> ServiceManager is independent of the Component marker interface
>>enabling broader application and support for existing "non-Avalon"
>>components (because ServiceManager exposes java.lang.Object as distinct
>>from Component).
>>
>>
>
>Which reminds me. Someone suggested that we deprecated the Block interface as
>it is just a marker interface.
>
+1
>However we would have to also deprecate the
>Composable interface within the context of Phoenix as now no Blocks would
>implement the Component interface. Thoughts on that?
>
>
+1
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
