RE: [Summary] Avalon 5 ComponentManager interface

[Leo Sutic]

> From: Leo Simons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>
> >  + All implementations must be thread safe.
> 
> thought: in a simple singlethreaded use of the framework, 
> thread safety is not something to be concerned about. It'd be 
> nice to not require a lot of work in this kind of setup. 
> Should be possible.

I'm fine with that.
 
> >  + A XXXXManager interface and a corresponding implementation is
> >    needed for each type 2 and 3 component == more code to write.
> 
> yup, but that code can be within avalon == all but completely 
> transparant to component developer. Right?

Something like what I described to Carsten?

I figure that is what will happen, too. The need is so obvious.

/LS



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>