Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > ..or am I trying to do the impossible here?
>
> Yes, this should work, but I don't see the real advantage of it.
> Now, a component framework should make working with components
> very easy. As a client (or Composer) I personally don't want to
> care about ThreadSafe or not (that is in my eyes one of the
> big advantages of the current 4.x implementation, although there
> are some other problems...).
> Now, if I want to lookup a component, I have to know if it is
> ThreadSafe or not. If it is ThreadSafe I directly get the component
> on lookup - if not, I get a "factory" and need a second method call
> on this factory to get the real component.
>
> And I believe that the client a) should not care about this implementation
> detail and b) in some cases even might not know about it.
Amen!
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
