RE: [Summary] Avalon 5 ComponentManager interface

[Leo Sutic]

> From: Robert Mouat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> 
> Leo Sutic wrote:
> 
> > this is my understanding of the sort-of concensus we have 
> arrived at. 
> > Some issues are still being debated, and I believe I have 
> marked those 
> > as such.
> <snip/>
> > We've agreed on removing release() from the CM interface, 
> and the rest 
> > of this sumary details how we get the same functionality 
> without that 
> > method.
> > 
> > We've agreed that all components returned from a CM are thread safe.
> 
> I must have missed this (in my desire not to read any emails 
> containing "ROLE",hint vs. "ROLE/hint" :)... so I'm going to 
> ask: why must they be thread safe?

Because they are looked up in compose() and then stays with the
composer for the composer's lifetime. As there may be several threads
in the composer accessing that component, it must be thread safe.

/LS


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>