> If we make the following assumptions: > > type 1 interface (no transaction): client may assume the component is > threadsafe > > type 2 or 2 interface (transaction involved): client may *not* assume > the component is threadsafe.
Actually, even with my previous correction, my argument fails unless the second assumption is changed to allow the client to assume the component is threadsafe outside the transaction -- as this is getting less and less desirable, I think I might drop it, apologies for the wasted bandwidth :) Robert. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
