> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Berin Loritsch wrote: > > The configuration package is pretty good, however we should include > > the same disclaimer text as mentioned in the thread on > > Parameterizable. > > *if* we put it there (still against it) > > > Also we should add a branch(Configuration config, String > newRootName) > > to the ConfigurationUtil class.... > > ?
I find it useful--especially when I need to branch configuration information that is 90% the same. > BTW, there is a commons-configuration going on. > How should we cope with that? There is? Don't they know they should work with tried and tested interfaces? :) Seriously, they do need to be made *aware* of what we have, and figure out what their configuration package hopes to accomplish that is beyond ours. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
