Leo Simons wrote: >>The reason Avalon is complex is that committers get a great deal of >>personal satisfaction from making it complex. The only thing that could >>be better would be to make it even more complex. Wait ! Here's a new >>feature with 3 new permutations. Let's add that too! No, let's start a >>whole new container. That's the ticket! Or should it be 3, one for each >>permutation? Hmm. > > > please. Don't. please. *Don't*. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: organisation of avalon subprojects Paul Hammant
- One Container Revisited Pete Carapetyan
- Re: One Container Revisited Stephen McConnell
- Re: One Container Revisited Pete Carapetyan
- RE: One Container Revisited Stephen Haberman
- Re: One Container Revisited Stephen McConnell
- Re: One Container Revisited Pete Carapetyan
- Re: One Container Revisited Peter Donald
- Re: One Container Revisited Stephen McConnell
- 'personal attacks' revisited (Re: One ... Leo Simons
- Re: One Container Revisited Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: One Container Revisited Adam Rossi
- RE: One Container Revisited Leo Sutic
- Re: One Container Revisited Michael Nash
- RE: One Container Revisited Leo Sutic
- RE: One Container Revisited Peter Donald
- Re: One Container Revisited Stephen McConnell
- RE: One Container Revisited Leo Sutic
- RE: One Container Revisited Adam Rossi
- Re: One Container Revisited Nicola Ken Barozzi
- Re: One Container Revisited Peter Donald