> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Hi,
>
> In the containerkit stuff we currently use the term
> "ServiceDesignator" to
> indicate a versioned interface. We also use the term
> "Service" to indicate
> a service that one component is capable of providing to
> another component.
> It is a superset of a ServiceDesignator as it includes an
> arbitrary set of
> attributes.
>
> The use of the term "service" may not be quite right because of the
> associated semantic baggage of the term. Can anyone think of
> a better term?
> If not is there any objections to using the term?
No objections here.
Why not merge ServiceDesignator and ServiceDescriptor into
ServiceDescriptor? Since a dependency can specify version, why not
extend it with attributes as well?
/LS
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
