Peter Donald wrote:
> At 08:39 AM 7/7/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>
>> This is bad move if we want to try and a build a common metamodel.
>
>
> I need commonality in component definition between myrmidon, cocoon
> and phoenix - this is achieved. If you really want to fully specify
> everything about every aspect of component management then feel free
> to attempt it.
Pete:
Nothing I am saying is anything about "specifying everything about every
aspect of component management". Perhaps you misunderstood what I said
- to clarify ... I am saying that :
* containerkit is too early to be considered "the reference"
* collaborative input and requirements have not been address
* a lot of potential improvement in API naming
* imprement need for non-static assembly
* bugs still be fixed
* seperation out of the kernel from the model
Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
