On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:50:45PM +0200, Leo Simons wrote: > On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 13:37, Peter Donald wrote: > > > > Forks are fine and healthy. Forced adoptions of untested code is never a good > > idea and has always resulted in crapola that we later regret and spend a year > > deprecating and replacing. > > very true. I am quite okay with the current divergence of efforts into > multiple forks. What I am very concerned about are statements that seem > to indicate there will not be convergence later, or that it will be > impossible.
Then the losers will have a choice of emulating the winners, or dying a natural death of disuse. You're right, it's easier to predict the winner of a one-horse race. My point is that if we end up having multiple horses, that is not a bad thing so long as users have enough information to be able to choose. --Jeff > cheers, > > - Leo Simons -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
