On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:50, Leo Simons wrote:
> > > hmm. We've not had a fork before.
> >
> > We have had massive numbers of forks before.
>
> okay, I definately misphrased some stuff here. Let me try and explain
> what I ment.
>
> We've not had forks of the core framework before.
actually we have. Cocoon people used to regularly swear at us because we kept
changing the framework. I remember at time where we would completely throw
out and restart the framework like 2-3 times a month. This was still in our
big ball of mud phase though ;)
> I consider the
> metainfo stuff currently under development something that should move
> into framework once stable. As long as we have competing implementations
> that will be impossible.
One will "win" and that will be the one that the most containers standardize
on. Considering that it is likely Phoenix and myrmidon will adopt the model I
think is best he either has to convince me that his way is better, get cocoon
on board (in which case it will be an impasse) or convert to non forked
codebase.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
-----------------------------------------------------
When a stupid man is doing something he's ashamed of,
he always declares that it is his duty.
George Bernard Shaw
-----------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
