> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 23:45, Berin Loritsch wrote: > > As someone already pointed out, CVS is not the place to do > battle. I > > do not want to see a bunch of commit messages with "Revert" as the > > only word. Any > > time something is reverted, there has to be more > explanation. *WHY* was > > it > > reverted? > > Same reason things are always reverted. They ignored a veto.
So what's wrong with posting a commit message that references the veto? Why was the veto made in the first place? BTW, in regards to the full license in the header of the source files, not one of us on this project has the authority to veto that ruling. It was made by the ASF. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
