Berin Loritsch wrote: ... > However it is something worthy of a vote on Avalon-Dev. Present your > arguments for or against.
Cocoon gives you more flexibility, but it's heavier. Have you tried the latest Cocoon I put in, it's much faster than the one you used before. On the other hand Anakia gives you speed. I personally don't give a damn about speed, since I use a validating XML editor, so I generate the docs only once a day. Have to generate the docs just to see how it comes out sucks big time. Wasn't it all about content-view separation? Then concentrate on the content. I prefer to have Cocoon, and I think that the current one works ok for my needs, present and future. A suggestion: in Centipede, I can use Maven's Anakia to generate the documentation. In this way Cocoon is used for the real site, Maven's Anakia for the ones that want speed in the doc writing cycle and don't use validating parsers. On the top of this, Forrest uses Cocoon and we're getting ready to support builds of Apache sites. The Forrest site is autogenerated every hour and published automatically to http://www.krysalis.org/forrest/ . I really hope we will use Forrest. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
