Peter Donald wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:35, Leo Simons wrote:

Question rizes: do current avalon committers and contributors like the
size and scope of the avalon project?

I know some of us (me, pete, for starters) feel actually splitting
avalon into multiple pieces would be good. This is a quick poll to
figure out how broad the support for this is =)

There'd perhaps be

avalon.apache.org
phoenix.apache.org
logkit.apache.org
altrmi.apache.org
...

Personally I would like to see testlet and some of the excalibur stuff go to the graveyard. LogKit be promoted and large chunks of excalibur moved to commons.apache.org or incubator.
+1

Then Avalon would be left with threee things. Client API for components (aka Framework), Containers for Client API (aka Fortress/Phoenix/Merlin) and some Services (though I am not sure whether these belong in another project or in commons or what).
The Turbine folks, who are now moving steadily to Avalon based as you know, have showed interest in a repository for Avalon Components.

For me it's
avalon-services.apache.org

or
services.apache.org

or simply in
commons.apache.org

NOTE:

IIUC commons.apache.org has been voted

incubator.apache.org has also been voted successfully

At times I have thought that moving Phoenix+Cornerstone+Apps to a new project would be a good thing and then at other times I hate the idea so ... ;)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to