Paul Hammant wrote:
Actually I was under the impression that this was discussed and agreed ages ago - Leo's email was just a pointed reminder that there is housekeeping based on the feedback from Stafano from the PMC concerning their unilateral position.In the meantime, here is a list of the license updates I've just committed:I think that was a bit unilateral.
avalon-framework
If you consider the license question as an open-issue, then yes, I can see how you could draw a conclusion that updating license statements in the framework was unilateral - however, I think that's wrong because this is a PMC position, not an Avalon position.
Cheers, Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:mcconnell@;osm.net
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
