On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:48, Stephen McConnell wrote: > This is the sort of thing I would like to get clarification on. The > email you referred to makes in effect a statement of preconditions > related to the basis on which assignment was made. Technically I agree > with the dual copyright position - but all this really means is that > there is an assignment of rights between Hunter and Apache.
Hunter assigned copyright to Apache on the code that he donated. > The > differenc between this and the Exolab case is the Exolab require that > recognition and inclusion of the copyright statements attributed to the > Exolab content. Apache is not in the buisness of licensing code from Exolab which is what you are talking about. -- Cheers, Peter Donald ---------------------------------------------------------------- Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it. Some can avoid it. Geniuses remove it. -- Perlis's Programming Proverb #58, SIGPLAN Notices, Sept. 1982 ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
