> > Which is it? Unified Container == Avalon 4.1 or Avalon 5? > > +1 for Avalon 5 > > It provides a new platform to build a unified community, and > clean up cruft so we have nothing deprecated. It also provides > opportunity to get input from other Apache communities to help > shape our decisions.
We will have to be *real* careful with our naming. Are we still going to refer to the interfaces as Avalon-Framework ? Or are they Avalon too. I really think we need to have a different name for the uber container as there are people out there that use the interfaces in their internal mainable() projects. IMHO.. Avalon == group of projects Avalon-Framework == lifecycle interfaces (our art) Containix == the reference ubercontainer Avalon-Phoenix == a generation 1 container, wound down when Containix reaches 1.0 There is already enough confusion without making... group-of-projects == framework == reference container -ph __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
