Peter Donald wrote:
Why don't we do both? It is more important to develope a model for 4.1 and continue enhance that where it is required. We can always keep a Framework5 revolution in mind but I think that will fall out of things we do for Framework4.x. ie As we find uglies in Framework4.x we add them to a list of things that we should fix in Framework5.x and if by the time 4.x is finished the list is big enough we move to Framework5.xWe haven't significantly changed Framework 4.1 for a long time. By adding more semantic clarification
to Framework 4.1, we are effectively defining a 4.2 which is still a new version. Dividing our interests
between 4.2, 5.0 and 4.1 would be too much work. Maintaining 4.1 while developing 5.0 is a better
use of our limited resources.
---------------------------------------------
Introducing NetZero Long Distance
1st month Free!
Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
