Paul Hammant wrote:
Leo,
the Context interface and its associated stage - Contextualizable - has been the subject of much controversy. As a matter of fact, I'd say that it is the single most controversial subject we have in Framework, and I'd like to propose a way where I think the conflicting viewpoints can be accomodated, although this will require some compromise.
-oOo-
[...]
I'm mostly comfortable with the definition you've given. I commend you for attempting a non-partisan solution to this issue. I'd like to propose that for this effort *you* are seen to lead the dialogue and dissentors to definitions suggest patches to you, rather that write some 10 page redifinition.
Umm, I wonder what Paul is talking about ...
dis-sent-er:
One who refuses to accept the doctrines or usages
of an established or a national church, especially
a Protestant who dissents from the Church of England.
Seems to me that you can only be a dissenter if you have an established belief from which one dissent - and if anything the threads related to context clearly indicate that there is hardly a case for an established belief pertaining to context.
;-)
Cheers, Steve.
<snip/>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
