Stefano
Actually, I stand by what I said. By pushing forward Leo as the lead for this, indicating his non partisan nature, I am doing the right thing. Both myself and anyone who might have contrary opinion are both losers. You'll note that I did not mention anyone's name in association with negative connotations in any email in this thread. Stefano, you've not afforded me the same courtesy...I'm mostly comfortable with the definition you've given. I commend you for attempting a non-partisan solution to this issue. I'd like to propose that for this effort *you* are seen to lead the dialogue and dissentors to definitions suggest patches to you, rather that write some 10 page redifinition.
Umm, I wonder what Paul is talking about ...
dis-sent-er:
One who refuses to accept the doctrines or usages
of an established or a national church, especially
a Protestant who dissents from the Church of England.
Seems to me that you can only be a dissenter if you have an established belief from which one dissent - and if anything the threads related to context clearly indicate that there is hardly a case for an established belief pertaining to context.
;-)
Paul, Stephen, can we start behaving as adults and dissipate personal friction between ourselves instead of throwing it back into the community? This is for *both* of you.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
