Hi Stephen,
Hope things are going well mate! :)
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 03:27:05PM +0100, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> Not really - its not big thing. I havn't looked at the sources in
> question - just working on the principal of seperating the core logkit
> package from a tool related to the package. Why? Because I'm interested
> in the subject and would dig into this some more at some point in the
> future.
From what I can see the classes Sylvain wrote act only as the bridge,
the actual LogFactor5 tool itself is located in the log4j jar
separately.
I think the code would be ok where Sylvain has it though - there's
already other non-core related output targets there. What do you
reckon ? Still think it would be a problem ?
Just my 2c AUS :)
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&'
&&&&.
&&&&&&&:
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
