Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > At 12:20 21/4/01 +0200, Stephen McConnell wrote: > >> I would say stability in general hasn't been it's strong > >> point ... lumping a whole bunch of junk into one jar > >> (including stuff that is volatile - see excalibur) is not > >> a way to achieve stability ;) > > > >Reality check ...!! > > > > 1. we are not talking about "junk" > > Some of it is (and I can say that because I wrote it) ;)
Then document this explicity. Detail what is good, what is bad, what should be removed, etc. > > 2. we are talking about a codebase that has not been sufficiently > > tested to call beta > > > 3. separation of this code base is not intended to achieve stability > > Thats my main in making it a separate CVS. > > > 4. separation of the code base will enable better manageability of > > of volatile content > > right ... so are you agreeing or disagreeing that there should be a > separate CVS ? Now Pete, you and I both know that you don't need a new CVS for this! Furthermore - the question is no longer on the agenda :-) Cheers, Steve. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
