On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:29, Stephen McConnell wrote: > Peter Donald wrote: > >On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:14, Stephen McConnell wrote: > >>Would you like to address the issue of a component implementation that > >>is already a proxy? > >>This isn't meta-data, its meta-info. See SUN JDK Javadoc for the > >>org.omg.CORBA.ORB class for a practicle example. > > > >It will be better supported in the future when we move to a more complete > > meta info system but for now it is easies and most useful to just support > > notion of interceptor chains on components. > > What about adding the Attributes type to the blockinfo. This would > enable the meta-info model used in Phoenix to pull out the information > in a manner consitent with the Type DTD, and the containerki DTDt. No > furture changes would be required and we would be eliminating an > artificial obligation of the assembler having to know about a component > implementation characteristic.
It hasn't seen enough testing. Post release I will integrate the containerkit config in as default and deprecate the old format. It will then be possible to experiment with addition of things like that. -- Cheers, Peter Donald -------------------------------------------------- "An intellectual is someone who has been educated beyond their intelligence." -------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
