Peter Donald wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:29, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
>
>>Peter Donald wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:14, Stephen McConnell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Would you like to address the issue of a component implementation that
>>>>is already a proxy?
>>>>This isn't meta-data, its meta-info. See SUN JDK Javadoc for the
>>>>org.omg.CORBA.ORB class for a practicle example.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>It will be better supported in the future when we move to a more complete
>>>meta info system but for now it is easies and most useful to just support
>>>notion of interceptor chains on components.
>>>
>>>
>>What about adding the Attributes type to the blockinfo. This would
>>enable the meta-info model used in Phoenix to pull out the information
>>in a manner consitent with the Type DTD, and the containerki DTDt. No
>>furture changes would be required and we would be eliminating an
>>artificial obligation of the assembler having to know about a component
>>implementation characteristic.
>>
>>
>
>It hasn't seen enough testing. Post release I will integrate the containerkit
>config in as default and deprecate the old format. It will then be possible
>to experiment with addition of things like that.
>
>
How about integrating the Type DTD instread of containekit. This will
ensure smoother integration between Fortress, Merlin and Phoenix. Are
there really and issues with the Type DTD ?
Steve.
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
