On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 17:26, Peter Royal wrote: > On Tuesday 23 July 2002 05:25 pm, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > Is there any reason in particular things like Sevak go into Phoenix and > > aren't just normal components? I want a servlet container component but > > I'm not running phoenix. Looking at it I could easily strip out phoenix > > references and make it work in fortress or my tweety mutant. > > No particular reason, other than the original developer probably uses Phoenix > and thus wrote it for that. > > You are correct, un-phoenixizing sevak would be very simple. Patches welcome > :)
Sure, I already did it. Where should the sources land? > > Will the common metadata/containerkit work allow for there to be more > > standard components? > > Yes, that is the goal. Yeah, that's what I figured as it only makes practical sense. > As for the current status, I'm not sure. The last big blowout discussion on > the containerkit bits was over things like BlockContext, so we'll see :) Cool. No big rush, I'm just hacking things as I need to for my prototype. I'm sure everything will coalesce in the near future. > -pete > > -- > peter royal -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
