On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:57:13PM -0400, safemode wrote:
> On Thursday 17 May 2001 22:26, Peter Surda wrote:
> > Actually Zdenek done lots of improvements on lessining sync time after I
> > fucked it up with the caching stuff :-). As I posted before, on the voodoo
> > I got "Sync 0.000757 ms" for the 50 frames or so of Tiger/Dragon which is
> > imho pretty good.
> I have some doubts to that number. Well, a great many doubts. First off
> what compiler did you use? Is it Redhat 7.
I use RH 6.2 on both computers and get such low numbers on both. I could try
it on RH 7.0 if you want.
> i'm sure you understand why i would ask that.
i do :-)
> Your other numbers tend to make one believe that none of the results can be
> truly trusted. the avg video throughput alone was enough to make me
> believe something was A. terribly wrong with the complier or B. some code
> glitch with the cvs used.
I guess its B.
> Really >8GB/s isn't possible.
agreed.
> I'm using more ram, quite a faster cpu and from what i heard a video card
> that's better supported by the X being used and it's agp, which alone
> doesn't have the ability to handle 8GB/s. my sync is 13.767225 ms with
> 5-15's cvs.
Well a mystery. Perhaps if I have some time I'll take a look at it.
Bye,
Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ICQ 10236103, +436505122023
--
/* vsprintf.c -- Lars Wirzenius & Linus Torvalds. */
/*
* Wirzenius wrote this portably, Torvalds fucked it up :-)
*/
PGP signature
