On Thursday 17 May 2001 12:59, Jukka Tastula wrote:
> On Thursday 17 May 2001 16:58, gaw zay wrote:
> > running benchmark with and without agpgart doesn't make any different in
> > performance. hm.
>
> And you STILL refuse to accept that its your cpu thats too slow?
i'm inclined to agree. i'm running a tuned up athlon K7-2 (athlon stepping
2) @850 and a V3 2000 agp. no need to do -20 if your other apps aren't using
cpu when you run it. And you shouldn't because -20 will still take a
performance hit. -20 sometimes is worse performance wise for threaded apps
than just 0. I did quite a few runs on different movies so it wouldn't be
able to cache stuff and i find 0 to be the best overall score. There are
slight differences due to the beginning sequences of the movies used to test.
I got lower numbers for the beginning to crouching tiger than i got for
Interview with a vampire. I think there should be a standard movie clip to
download from if we're gonna compare scores like this. My scores were
around 50-60MB/s for avg video output across most videos. and an avg
framerate of 35-45fps. Your best bet for increasing performance is moving
to the X cvs since it's xv and hardware drivers for the V3 are more complete
than the stable versions. For the most part your cpu is probably slow or
your system is not configured correctly in the bios to take advantage of it's
features.
_______________________________________________
Avifile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile
