Hi
To be clear about .so files, they will be named .so.6 right?
On 10 Aug 2001 14:03:18 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Anyway is there anyway who would strongly disagree with this change ?
> (+ reasons of course)
I don't see this approach in too many packages. bonobo, gnome-print
don't use version numbers in /usr/include/<package>
About compatibilities, don't see what's the problem, as other packages
require a minimum version for the packages they depend on.
I think you should go with /usr/include/avifile/
--
Marius Andreiana
--
You don't have to go to jail for helping your neighbour
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/
_______________________________________________
Avifile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://prak.org/mailman/listinfo/avifile
