> 
> 
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Julia Weissbrot wrote:
> 
> 
> Hmmmmm.
> I do the same thing as you do, except for:
> 
> 1.) I install the lame-3.89 with "make install" and not manually.

I did it manually because 'make install' did not work.
 
> 2.) I used the compiler optimizations 
> "-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -funroll-loops".
> Is that what you meant by "lowered optimization"?

Since I haven't tested it with these flags, it may not be the reason.
I removed those optimizations, for better gdbing. 

> 3.) I have yesterdays CVS-tree, since todays ./configure
> seems to be broken. 

I have the last official CVS-Snapshot.

> 4.) With this very recent version of avifile the package x2divx-9a
> does not compile on my system any more. I use
> avirecompress anyway.

x2divx-9a does compile on my system, after fixing the errors ;o)
Was some stupid error, something did not compile because a variable was
declared after a function 
call (which seems to be illegal in C).

That was something like: bla(); int result = something(); which I changed to
  int result; bla(); result = something();

> Is there any essential difference between what I did
> and what you did?

Are you sure that the right libraries are used and not some older bogus ones
like the avifile ones?

It should work, because I had exactly the same error, and now it works for
me.

> Alex
> 

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net

Binary data

Reply via email to