On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:23 AM Lukáš Doktor <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Guannan, > > theoretically we should not accept such backport, because it's a new > feature, not a bugfix. Anyway it touches `avocado.utils` and it's not > changing existing callbacks. What do you think, guys? In my view the > `avocado/core` is the core and I wouldn't like such changes there, but I'd > be fine with some exceptions when it goes to `avocado/utils`. > I believe we should stick to the established policy. Guannan should be able to put the needed backported functions into a testing specific library, until he can move away from 36lts. > Lukáš > > Dne 8.9.2017 v 08:41 Guannan Sun napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > As RHEL6 still need use 36lts, and cases updated with using the function > in > > PR 1376: > > > > https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado/pull/1376 > > > > could you help backport the commits to 36lts? > > > > Thanks! > > Guannan > > > > >
