On Wednesday 16 April 2008 14:02, Andy H wrote: > RFC > > A problem has come up trying to fix function pointer arthmetic bugs. [...]
(It is difficult to understand all quickly.) A question: Is it safety to use common indirect call of function with avr6 at present moment? It is interesting, as indirect call is used in Avr-libc's EEPROM functions now. I have try a small program. Seems, the result is wrong (Binutils is 2.18, see avr-libc-dev discussion). Thanks, Dmitry. _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
