Hi Ray,
>As for the other concerns, I am not really looking at pushing this >upstream but more a project for myself that I would make available to >the world as an optional patch. I think it is too preliminary to decide whether this can go upstream. Let the requirement and design evolve. Then we can discuss the impact. Infact this is a pretty interesting one. If this feature is designed as an optional one (made possible with one of the new target specific options), I see no reason why it should not go upstream. The usage is upto the user. > My inquiry here was mostly an early >question of how feasible this would be and where should I start >looking in the code to get a start on it. As for what project I am >wanting to use this for, there are a number of them. It came to mind >as I was looking at the python on a chip project that wants lots of >memory. Ideas are always welcome :-) Anitha _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
