As Jens Bauer wrote: > Do you know if there's a reason for this, or is it just because "it > doesn't fit in logically" ?
It is far too AVR-specific to go into a generic toolchain as GNU binutils are. In order for being acceptable there, it would have to be designed in a much more generic way, so it at least would become applicable to other similar device families (say, all flash controllers that are supported). The IMHO better way would have been to continue the old shellscript instead, call avr-size as the backend tool, and perform all the relative percentage calculations in the script. That's the way WinAVR started with. You might still find copies of the script floating in the net somewhere (search for "avr-sizex"). -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list