On 2011-10-27 09:32, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > "Jens Bauer" <j...@bruger.mine.nu> wrote: > >> I'll take a look at the Codesourcery toolchain anyway, it might >> contain some good hints and tips. :) > I took a look at the Codesourcery code. The issue there is that all > you get is a large blurb of hacked up sourcecode, while Michael > Fischer separates his (sparse) patches from the actual source. So > with Codesourcery, you simply get a large "black box" of code. > > Comparing it with a regular GCC tree yields many many differences, and > it's not completely clear which GCC version they based their work on - > presumably simply some SVN snapshot of the day. > You have to remember that Codesourcery is/was payed by ARM to develop and maintain arm-gcc. So afaik. a lot of the patches hasn't found their way into the official "tree".
But at least before they were acquired by Mentor , i considered Codesourcery to be the the "latest" in arm-gcc I don't know what their status is after the acquisition. /Bingo _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
