As Eric Weddington wrote:

> I'm going through the .dox files in the doc/api directory. Why do
> these files have a 2-clause BSD license instead of the 3-clause
> license used for the source code?

Good question, perhaps because Ted once created them that way?

It shouldn't matter too much, as these files will never be linked into
customer's applications, but from a consistency point of view, it
doesn't make much sense either to have them under a different license
than the actual code.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


_______________________________________________
AVR-libc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev

Reply via email to